A Poignant Message to the Muslim UmmahThe historic Khutbah of Shaykh Ali Abd-ur-Rahmaan al-Hudhaifee, Imaam of Masjid-an-Nabawi (in Saudi Arabia) just before he was placed under "house arrest". Delivered in Masjid Nabawi, 15th Dhu-l-Qadah, 1418 Hijri/ 13th March 1998 How can there be any compromise or link between the Ahl-us-Sunnah and the Shee'ah ? The Ahl-us-Sunnah are those who uphold the Qur'aan and the Hadeeth (Sunnah). It is through them that Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa has protected the deen. They are those who engaged in Jihaad for the glory and dignity of Islam and established the glorious history of Islam.
On the other hand the state of the Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) is that they are those who curse and insult the Sahabah (RadiaLlaahu anhum). Thay are those who are denigrating and demolishing Islam. For, indeed, it is the Sahaabah (RadiaLllaahu anhum) who are the ones through whom the Deen has been passed down to us. So those people who curse and insult them, in reality, are destroying Islam.
Therefore, how can there be any association or compromise between the Ahl-us-Sunnah and the Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) whilst they (Shee'ahs) curse and denigrate the three Khulafaa: Abu Bakr Siddeeq, Umar Faarooq and Uthman, Radiallaahu anhum ?
If they had any sense, they would know and appreciate that they are in reality cursing the Holy Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam himself. Abu Bakr and Umar radiallaahu anhumaa were both fathers-in-law of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam. Also, during the lifetime of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam both were his right hand men; and after his demise, it is they who had great worry feeling for the welfare of the Deen. Who else has ever been honoured with such a position and honour as was granted to these two ? Again, it is these two who had always participated and had been with the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam during all the Ghazaawaat (battles). These facts are enough to refute the Shee'ah beliefs.
As for Uthmaan radiallaahu anhu, he was the husband to two daughters of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam. It is clear that Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa does not choose for His Rasool sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam a son-in-law and companions except those who are the best.
If the Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) are true to their claims, then could they explain why Rasoolullaah sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam did not forewarn the Ummah and clarify the alleged enmity of the Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha (ie Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan radiallaahu anhum) towards Islam ?
Their insults and curses are not limited just to the Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha but are also directed towards Ali Radiallaahu anhu. Because Ali Radiallaahu anhu himself, in Masjid Rabia, gave the oath of allegiance (bai'ah) to Abu Bakr radiallaahu anhu and also gave his daughter, Umm Kulthum, Radiallahu anha, in marriage to Umar Radiallaahu anhu. He also willingly gave the oath of allegiance (bai'ah) to Uthmaan radiallaahu anhu. Not only this, but he was actually the right hand man and a well-wisher of the Khulafaa ath-Thalaatha. So could Ali radiallaahu anhuhave chosen a kaafir as a son-in-law for himself ? And could Ali radiallaahu anhu have given the oath of allegiance (bai'ah) ,as he did, to a kaafir ? Subhaan Allaah! This indeed is a great accusation!
Also, by cursing Mu'aawiya radiallaahu anhu, these Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) are actually cursing Hasan Radiallaahu anhu. Because Hasan radiallahu anhuwithdrew from, and gave up the Khilaafah to Mu'aawiya radiallaahu anhu purely for the pleasure of Allaah. Rasoolullaah sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam foretold of this in the hadeeth. So can the grandson of Rasoolullaah sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam actually have withdrawn from and left the Khilaafah in the hands of a Kaafir for him to rule over the people ? Subhaan Allaah! This indeed is a great accusation and insult!
If the Rawaafidh say that Ali and Hasan radiallahu anhumaa were forced into doing this, then this is proof enough that these Rawaafidh have no sense whatsoever. The accusations levelled against these two honoured companions of the Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam are the worst insults ever imaginable and are beyond belief.
Furthermore, how do these Rawaafidh curse and insult Umm ul Mu'mineen (mother of the Believers) A'isha radiallaahu anha when Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa Himself has mentioned her in the Qur'aan as the mother of the believers ?
Allaah tabaarak wa ta'aalaa says:
"The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their (believers) mothers (as regards respect and marriage)." (al-Ahzaab, verse 6)
There is no doubt whatsoever that only that person will curse and insult Umm al-Mu'mineen who does not consider her to be a mother. Because for one who does have a mother, does not curse and insult her, but loves her.
How then can there be any compromise between the Ahl-us-Sunnah and the Rawaafidh when the fact is that these Rawaafidh regard the leader of dalaalah (misguidance) Khomeini as sinless and one protected from committing sins ? They actually admit to this (that Khomeini is sinless and protected from sinning) because they consider him to be the deputy of their own Mahdi ("Muhammad son of al-Hasan al-Askari") - ( not the awaited Mahdi of Ahl-usSunnah wal Jamaa'ah). The Mahdi about whom they maintain the belief that he is presently concealed in the cave called 'Samurah'.
Now, because Khomeini is the deputy of their Mahdi and the order of the deputy is essentially the order of the deputor, the Mahdi, therefore, here, their inference is that, as the awaited Mahdi is Ma'soom (protected from sinning) then Khomeini is also Ma'soom, being the Mahdi's deputy. Also these Rawaafidh do not content themselves with just this but they continue and maintain that all their Faqihs (scholars) are also Ma'soom and all these Faqihs hold the status of being close to Allaah (walee)!
As can be seen this is an open contradiction of their own beliefs. In this way they have actually destroyed the basis of their own religion. This is not surprising, because facts based on falsehood and lies always do clash and contradict with each other, and thus, a religion based on lies brings about its own destruction.
None of the Ahl-ul-Bayt (the family of the Holy Prophet sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) subscribed to the false beliefs of these Rawaafidh (Shee'ah). There are numerous solid arguments based on logic and Shari'ah refuting their religion and false beliefs. These arguments are so many that it would be difficult to recount thema all. Therefore they should repent from their Baatil Aqeedah (false and unfounded beliefs) and enter into the fold of Islam.
Therefore, we, Ahl-us-Sunnah, cannot be close to them even to the extent of a hair. As regards to Islam, these people (the shee'ah) are actually more dangerous than the Jews and the Christians. They should never and can never be trusted in any way whatsoever. In fact, Muslims must always lie in wait and constantly be in a state of defence against their evil plots and deceptions.
Allaah tabarak wa ta'aalaa says:
"They are the enemies, so beware of them. May Allaah curse them! How are they denying (or deviating from) the Right Path." (al-Munaafiqoon, verse 4)
These Rawaafidh (Shee'ah) actually descend from Abu Lu'luah Majoosi (a fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Sabah Yahoodi (a Jew).
Therefore, O Muslims! There is no alternative for the Muslims but to differentiate between Haqq and Baatil in their beliefs and to consider good only what Allaah has declared as good, and to consider as condemned what Allaah has condemned and disapproved of.
more detail click http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/hudhaithi_khutbah.htm
ผู้เขียน
หัวข้อ: เมื่อชีอะฮฺตนหนึ่งถูกคำพูดของชัยคฺฮุซัยฟีย์ตบจนหน้าชาในมัสยิดนบี (อ่าน 545 ครั้ง)
